The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Decision-Making: Balancing Innovation with Accountability and Integrity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47363/JESMR/2025(6)305Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Ethical Decision-Making, Algorithmic Accountability, Innovation Governance, Transparency, Bias Mitigation, Data Ethics, Stakeholder Theory, Responsible Innovation, Technology Acceptance Model, Quantitative Research, Integrity in AI, Regulatory Compliance, Human-Centered AI, Institutional Pressures, Trust in AI SystemsAbstract
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies become increasingly embedded in critical organizational decision-making processes, questions of ethics, accountability, and integrity have risen to the forefront of academic and industry discourse. This study investigates the ethical implications of AI in decisionmaking, with a specific focus on how organizations can balance technological innovation with moral responsibility and regulatory accountability. Guided by an integrated theoretical framework that combines Ethical Decision-Making Theory, Stakeholder Theory, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and the Responsible Innovation Framework, this research provides a multidimensional perspective on AI ethics in practice.
A quantitative research methodology was employed, gathering data from 395 stakeholders including AI developers, corporate leaders, ethics compliance officers, public regulators, data scientists, and end-users across sectors such as finance, healthcare, education, and government services. The study examines stakeholder perceptions on key ethical dimensions of AI implementation—algorithmic transparency, data privacy, bias mitigation, informed consent, accountability mechanisms, and the inclusiveness of AI design. A structured survey instrument was used to assess how these variables influence organizational trust, adoption willingness, and public acceptance of AI-driven decisions.
The findings are expected to demonstrate that organizations that embed ethical safeguards and transparent governance frameworks within their AI systems can significantly enhance stakeholder trust, user engagement, and regulatory compliance. The study also highlights critical challenges, including the opacity of black-box algorithms, the absence of global ethical standards, the underrepresentation of marginalized groups in algorithmic training data, and the tensions between innovation speed and ethical reflection. Additionally, it explores how external institutional pressures—such as media scrutiny, customer expectations for ethical AI, investor demand for ESG-compliant practices, and evolving legal mandates—act as catalysts for adopting ethical AI governance models.
This research makes several key contributions. First, it bridges a significant gap in the empirical literature on AI ethics by quantitatively analyzing perceptions across diverse industries and stakeholder categories. Second, it offers a conceptual model for balancing innovation with ethical accountability that can guide practitioners, policymakers, and technologists in AI strategy formulation. Third, it provides a framework for integrating responsible AI principles into corporate governance and digital transformation strategies. The study ultimately advocates for the co-evolution of ethical standards and AI capabilities to ensure that technological progress does not come at the expense of human values, social justice, or democratic integrity
