Worried about the Modification of the Genetic Heritage of Haitians

Abstract

Haiti was forced to sign the free trade agreement at the end of the twentieth century, under the threats of some international financial institutions Lucien (2009). These are maneuvers of imperialism. Imperialism has mainly used the structures at its disposal to impose its whims on small countries through regulatory devices, Grenoble École Management (2012). Thus the obligation was made to Haiti for its integration into the established commercial jungle, the Structural Adjustment Plan (PAS) of the markets. On the international level, referring to the Marxist thought of Gonidec Pierre François, these forms of agreements are the fruit of the balance of power between States. The PAS is neither fair nor equitable, it is only based on the capacity (power) of production, while third world countries like Haiti do not have this capacity. By this incapacity, they have been forced to become purveyors of raw materials to foreign industries, what some thinkers have called a “return to the plantation”. In the meantime, the developed and industrialized countries continue to occupy the market of these countries, including Haiti, with their products, because they have the massive production capacity and they are the holders of the technology. Under the weight of the SAP, Haiti therefore received an economic knockout blow. The local market is taken hostage, local agricultural production is absorbed by external producers, and the Haitian peasants are therefore annihilated. At first glance, however, the agreement purported to adjust world markets. That is to say, to make producers from small countries accessible to the markets of developed countries, under the obedience of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Similar facts in the world lead Grenoble Ecole Management to formulate such conclusions on North American and European States: it is States that establish international institutions so that they can control the agri-food market and its regulatory environment. There is no reconciliation between morality and political realism in international relations, a relationship which Stanley Hoffman (1971) seeks to establish through one of his works.