Survivorship of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 55 Years Old

Authors

  • Luke S Austin Rothman Orthopaedic Institute 925 Chestnut St Philadelphia, USA Author
  • Quincy T Cheesman Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA Author
  • James F Stenson Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stratford, NJ Author
  • Patrick F Szukics Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stratford, NJ Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47363/JPMRS/2020(2)114

Keywords:

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty, Rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Historically, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been reserved for elderly patients. Patients younger than 55 requiring RSA are challenging as they live longer, place more stress and wear on implants, and have higher reoperation rates compared to patients older than 55 years of age. Our goal was to examine the survivorship and functional outcomes of patients younger than 55 years old undergoing RSA. Patients younger than 55 years old who underwent RSA with a minimum two year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated implant survivability, postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, etiology of surgery, and medical demographic data. 29 RSA were performed on 22 patients (7 were bilateral). 20 of the 29 shoulders (68.9%) had a minimum two year follow up and were included for data analysis. Indications for RSA in our patients included: cuff tear arthropathy (14), post-traumatic arthritis (7), rheumatoid arthritis (3), primary osteoarthritis (3), and irreparable rotator cuff repair (2). The average age of the patient at time of surgery was 52.6 years (range 45-54.9 years). Average post-operative ASES score was 80.9 (range 33.3-100.0). There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between number of surgeries on the ipsilateral shoulder and post-operative ASES score (r= -0.55, p= 0.02). No patients included in our data analysis required revision surgery. We conclude that in patients younger than 55 with complex pathology and limited treatment options, RSA provides a durable shoulder arthroplasty option without any early failures at 2-year follow-up.

Author Biographies

  • Luke S Austin, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute 925 Chestnut St Philadelphia, USA

    Luke S Austin, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute 925 Chestnut St Philadelphia, USA.

  • Quincy T Cheesman, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA

    Quincy T Cheesman, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

  • James F Stenson, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stratford, NJ

    James F Stenson, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stratford, NJ

  • Patrick F Szukics, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stratford, NJ

    Patrick F Szukics, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stratford, NJ.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-30