Juba Peace Agreement ( JPA): Bridging Traditional and ModernConflict Resolution Mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47363/JPSIR/2025(3)113Keywords:
Judiyya, Ajaweed, Mediation, Negotiations, Reconciliation, Conflict Resolution, Peacebuilding, SecurityAbstract
This paper examines the signing of the Juba Peace Agreement (JPA) in October 2020, highlighting how the integration of traditional and modern conflict resolution mechanisms was pivotal to its success. Particular focus is placed on the indigenous practices of Judiyya and Ajaweed, historically employed in Darfur and Kordofan to mediate and resolve disputes among local communities in Sudan.
By applying the principles and values of these age-old mechanisms, the South Sudan Mediation Committee (SSMC) effectively facilitated negotiations between the Transitional Government of Sudan (TGoS) and the Sudanese Revolutionary Front This culminated in the successful signing of the peace accord on October 3, 2020 [1].
The integration of these traditional practices into modern mediation not only fostered a positive atmosphere but also informed key negotiation strategies. These approaches led to breakthroughs on critical issues and laid the groundwork for the agreement’s implementation, demonstrating the enduring relevance of indigenous conflict resolution systems in contemporary peacebuilding efforts.
