The Viability of a Scientific Philosophy: Proving that Computers are Human Creations without the Ability to Think

Abstract

In 1950, an article was published, which contained the conclusions of the Turing test [1]. Then, representatives of the logicism doctrine made the following conclusion. That in principle it is possible to create an Artificial Intelligence (AI) that can think like a person. With another, representatives of the psychology doctrine concluded that this is impossible. For example, H. Dreyfus claimed that it is impossible to achieve from an AI program efficiency comparable to a person [2]. D. Searle argued that a computer is just a symbol-searching device using a set of syntactic rules. What it lacks is the ability of biological intelligence to interpret semantics. Biologically, the roots of semantics of meaning remain a mystery [3]. In this article, developing the ideas set out in article,
an attempt is made to prove the following [4]. Computers created by people can never acquire the ability to think.