Postulates of Special Relativity Need to be Supplemented for Wigner-Thomas Rotation to Exist

Authors

  • Karunesh M. Tripathi Retired (vol.) Chief Engineer, Western Railway, Church Gate, Mumbai, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47363/JPSOS/2025(7)349

Keywords:

Special Relativity, Wigner Thomas Rotation, Lorentz Transformation, Spacetime, General Relativity

Abstract

The inertial frames are the frames moving with a uniform velocity in any direction. The second postulate of Special Relativity speaks of constancy of light speed (in vacuum) in all inertial frames, with no riders. However, it is taken to implicitly mean only those inertial frames that are moving along the line from origin to the event’s location, or of light propagation. For the inertial frames moving otherwise i.e. in directions oblique to the latter, the setup is converted back to the same (i.e. parallel moving observer), by taking up the distance component parallel to observer’s motion for transformation, and ignoring the rest of its components.


The Wigner-Thomas rotation arises only on account of this limited interpretation. It disappears when obliquely moving (with respect to direction of event from origin) inertial frames are given recognition. The two non-collinear boosts are equivalent to one boost in the resultant direction that is oblique to the directions of both the boosts. The example presented in the article amply demonstrates it.

Therefore, to give sanctity to the Wigner-Thomas rotation, the second postulate needs to be supplemented by specifying the “Inertial Frames” with a rider “that are moving along the Line of its (light’s) motion”.


Further, the Lorentz Transformation have not been and also cannot be derived for events other than those of light. However, these are universally applied to such events e.g. those of non-collinearly moving frames in this case. Thus, another (third) postulate is required to be added, and i.e. “The transformation arrived at for light applies to other events also, where the distance-time ratio is not equal to c”.


Addition of the postulate will provide the much needed authorization for working out of Wigner-Thomas rotation, along with numerous other cases such as length contraction and time dilation on moving bodies, though with errors. The error would obviously be proportional to the difference between the distance-time ratio of the event and c.

Author Biography

  • Karunesh M. Tripathi, Retired (vol.) Chief Engineer, Western Railway, Church Gate, Mumbai, India

    Karunesh M. Tripathi, Retired (vol.) Chief Engineer, Western Railway, Church Gate, Mumbai, India.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16