Assessing the Accuracy of LiDAR Surveys for Geodetic MassBalances in Glaciers of Chilean Central Andes

Authors

  • Gonzalo Barcaza Centre for Environmental Technologies, Federico Santa María Technical University (CETAM-UTFSM), Valparaíso, Chile Author
  • Felipe Gómez Department of Civil Engineering, Federico Santa María Technical University, Valparaíso, Chile Author
  • Ximena Fadic Centre for Environmental Technologies, Federico Santa María Technical University (CETAM-UTFSM), Valparaíso, Chile Author
  • Felipe McCracken Department of Civil Engineering, Federico Santa María Technical University, Valparaíso, Chile Author
  • Guillermo Tapia General Directorate of Water, Ministry of Public Works, Santiago, Chile Author
  • Francisco Cereceda-Balic Centre for Environmental Technologies, Federico Santa María Technical University (CETAM-UTFSM), Valparaíso, Department of Chemistry, Federico Santa María Technical University (UTFSM), Valparaíso, Chile Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47363/JEESR/2025(7)244

Keywords:

Chilean Central Andes, Geodetic Mass Balance, LiDAR, Accuracy Assessment

Abstract

Repeat high-resolution (1m2) airborne light radio detection and ranging (LiDAR) laser altimetry data (2009-2015) for geodetic mass balances on five
mountain glaciers, and its near-time ground-control points (GCPs) surveyed by global positioning system (GPS) on glacier surface (2015), were firstly
used for accuracy assessment of elevation changes (dh/dt) in Chilean Central Andes. The inverse distance weighting algorithm (IDW) reproduced the glacier surface topography with the minimum root mean square error (RMSE) when a digital elevation model (DEM) is created. High thinning rates in meter water equivalent (mw.e.) were found at Echaurren Norte and San Francisco glaciers, two partially covered low-elevation glaciers, with -1.69 ± 0.14 m and -1.3 ± 0.19 m, respectively, while at Yeso and Bello, two high-altitude clean-ice glaciers, a more moderate rate of -0.65 ± 0.24 m and -0.66 ± 0.14 m was derived. Likewise, Pirámide is a debris-covered glacier with a negligible elevation change. Although systematic and random errors using glacierized nd non-glacierized terrain shows neglected differences, inaccuracies induced by pre-processing interpolation parameters yield positive and negatives differences of up to 2.04 m which leads to 3% biases in the geodetic mass balances.

Author Biography

  • Gonzalo Barcaza, Centre for Environmental Technologies, Federico Santa María Technical University (CETAM-UTFSM), Valparaíso, Chile

    Gonzalo Barcaza, Centre for Environmental Technologies, Federico Santa María Technical University (CETAM-UTFSM), Valparaíso, Chile.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28