Extended Comparison Study a mong lab-Tested HbA1C, ADA’seGA HbA1C Conversion Model, and eclaireMD HbA1C PredictionModel based on lower Bound and Higher Bound of MeasuredGlucoses Using GH-Method: Math-Physical Medicine (No. 341)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47363/JDRR/2020(2)116Keywords:
GH-Method, Math-physical medicine (MPM) , American Diabetes Association (ADA), estimated average glucose (eAG), type 2 diabetes (T2D) , continuous glucose monitoring sensor (CGM Sensor)Abstract
This paper describes the author’s extended study regarding American Diabetes Association (ADA) recently recommended estimated average glucose (eAG) equation. He conducts a rational range analysis with lower bound and higher bound of different HbA1C values for type 2 diabetes (T2D) conditions by using glucoses collected via finger-piercing test strip method (Finger) and continuous glucose monitoring sensor (CGM Sensor). This study also includes his developed eclaireMD mathematical model of predicted HbA1C and A1C value calculated using the ADA’s eAG A1C conversion equation.
Downloads
Published
2020-10-22
Issue
Section
Articles
