Maintenance Strategy Optimization Using Failure Rate Analysis and Risk-Based Inspection: Review, Gap Analysis, Framework Development, and Case Study

Authors

  • Attia Hussien Gomaa Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering. Shubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47363/JEAST/2026(8)346

Keywords:

Maintenance Optimization, Failure Rate Modeling, Risk-Based Inspection, Reliability Engineering, Asset Integrity Management, Remaining Useful Life, Reliability-Centered Framework

Abstract

Optimizing maintenance in asset-intensive industries requires integrating reliability, safety, and cost under uncertain, time-dependent degradation. Conventional strategies often fail to capture stochastic failure behavior, limiting predictive capability and leading to suboptimal inspection and replacement decisions. Although Risk- Based Inspection (RBI) enhances asset prioritization, its implementation often relies on static assumptions, fragmented data structures, and limited adaptability. A review of maintenance optimization, failure-rate modeling, and RBI applications reveals key gaps: isolated deployment of Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM), Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), and RBI; insufficient integration of predictive analytics; limited quantification of cost–risk–reliability trade-offs; and inadequate modeling of system-level interdependencies. These gaps constrain the evolution toward dynamic, risk-informed maintenance systems. This study proposes an Integrated Reliability-Centered Framework (IRCF) that unifies probabilistic reliability modeling, RBI principles, and predictive condition monitoring in a continuous, data-driven architecture. The framework integrates time-dependent failure rate estimation, quantitative risk assessment, and Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction, with feedback mechanisms that dynamically update risk rankings and inspection intervals. Application of the IRCF to a feedwater centrifugal pump station in a steam generation system reduced downtime by ~25% and maintenance costs by ~20%, while enhancing safety through risk-prioritized interventions. Inspection intervals derived from Probability of Failure (PoF) and RUL metrics optimized resource allocation and minimized unnecessary preventive maintenance.

Author Biography

  • Attia Hussien Gomaa, Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering. Shubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt

    Attia Hussien Gomaa, Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering. Shubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt

Downloads

Published

2026-03-13